Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1963) Richard ..

 In 1962, historian Richard Hofstadter famously dubbed it “anti-intellectualism in American life.”

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” – Isaac Asimov

I found myself wondering also if the lack of a really strong strain of communism in the intellectual pot of America has not deprived us, culturally and collectively, of a way to make claims for economic equality without sliding between the notions of economic class and social class. Of course, a good part of the history that Hofstadter treats here comes well before the cold war and the American witch hunts, but it does seem that since this book was published, an anti-intellectual strain that conflates fanciness of all kinds with specifically economic power has caused great damage to the quality of American life and the character of American struggles for equity, and that a knee-jerk fear of anything even vaguely socialist is preventing the disentangling of those two ideas.

“Decrying racism and gun violence is fine, but for too long America’s social dysfunction has continued to intensify as the nation has ignored a key underlying pathology: anti-intellectualism,” Noise wrote in in a post published on the website.

Anti-intellectualismin American Life By Richard Hofstadter (Mother Jones)

The rejection of science seems to be part of a politically monolithic red-state fundamentalism, textbook evidence of an unyielding ignorance on the part of the religious. As one fundamentalist slogan puts it, “The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it.” But evangelical Christianity need not be defined by the simplistic theology, cultural isolationism and stubborn anti-intellectualism that most of the Republican candidates have embraced.

by chronicling the long history of American anti-intellectualism

Both O'Reilly and Limbaugh, as well as other conservative hosts such as and , are frequently accused of having anti-intellectual atmospheres on their shows, evidenced by their frequent interruption of guests who try to put forward complex arguments. Scarborough once commented that, "If my guest is allowed to speak uninterrupted for more than 15 seconds, then I'm not doing my job."[]

Intellectualism for All - Essay by Numkah - Anti Essays

THE Republican presidential field has become a showcase of evangelical anti-intellectualism. Herman Cain, Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann deny that climate change is real and caused by humans. Mr. Perry and Mrs. Bachmann dismiss evolution as an unproven theory. The two candidates who espouse the greatest support for science, Mitt Romney and Jon M. Huntsman Jr., happen to be Mormons, a faith regarded with mistrust by many Christians.

This book is not a militant intellectual ranting against the conventional philistines. This is an essential history of US along the strand of the uneven relationship of intellectualism and the society at large. Each segment - from politics, religion, cultural and education — is traced with the shifting or cyclical position of intellectual life.

Bauer’s essay concludes with an appeal, in an age of anti-intellectualism, to rediscover Voltaire:

An example of educational anti-intellectualism - Larry …

It is excellent and in depth and sadly much of it is still perfectly relevant. Also great for anyone interested in US history. Hofstadter's examination of religion and its role in American society is fascinating. It is by no means simple, there have been multiple factions in the religious sphere here, some were forces for enlightenment/reason/knowledge and others were anti-intellectual forces that cudgeled people with blind dogmatism a


Open Document. Below is an essay on "Intellectualism for All" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.

I’m still thinking about the end of Hofstadter’s book. He is hopeful that liberal culture will endure despite various anti-intellectual viruses attacking it. I don’t know. I hope he’s right. In any case, I want to end my review with Hofstadter’s hopeful outlook, because it is powerful and worth heeding as we move forward:

The cult of ignorance in the United States: Anti-intellectualism and the "dumbing down" of America There is a growing and disturbing trend of anti-intellectual

It is excellent and in depth and sadly much of it is still perfectly relevant. Also great for anyone interested in US history. Hofstadter's examination of religion and its role in American society is fascinating. It is by no means simple, there have been multiple factions in the religious sphere here, some were forces for enlightenment/reason/knowledge and others were anti-intellectual forces that cudgeled people with blind dogmatism and preached constant and full submission to authority. These forces waxed and waned, sometimes one gaining the upperhand over the other in the political sphere, each exerting different levels of power in various regions. There is also an interesting class angle that is intermixed within all this, the main one that comes to mind is the elite New England uppercrust religious intellectuals who held a lot of power and sway in that region and often times at the federal level. They helped establish many of the original higher level education institutions. Some fascinating dynamics between them and anti-establishment anti-elitist populist dogmatists who preached against reason and science because it didn't conform to their world-views. But they also hated the elitist New England brahmins because of their outsized power and their monopolization of the educational resources in this country.

Anti intellectualism essay. When a visitor, client, tenant or potential tenant enters your building, the lobby is the first thing they will notice.

Hello Mike–if you read Mark Noll’s The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, you’ll get a good handle on the historical source of the anti-intellectualism. Noll locates it in the 1st and 2nd great awakening and the focus (there) on immediatism, emotionalism, and personal conversion. All of these utlimately undermined the life of hte mind over time. Up until the middle of the 1800’s Christian ministers were the presidents of most of our higher education institutions. With the secularization of the academy between 1850 and 1930, Christian’s no longer were the intellectual giants in any field. Thankfully, this is changing, as many Christians are again taking seriously the life of the mind. I hope that helps a bit! warmly, Paul