Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why …

Home » Why Condoms Are Important Why Are Condoms Important

Americans love to tout the value of waiting until to have . We teach abstinence-only education in schools across the country, and even comprehensive sex-ed programs often point out that "abstinence is best." Pop stars from Britney Spears to Jessica Simpson, to the Jonas Brothers, to Miley Cyrus, to Justin Bieber routinely assert that they're waiting 'til marriage – putting them into the Good Role Model category (at least, until someone leaks a sex tape). There's a booming "purity industry", complete with jewelry, elaborate events, books, t-shirts and DVDs.

It's hard to believe that in the year 2016, only , although avoiding discussion of sex and sexuality has proven to be a failure in preventing sexual activity among teens. Out of these 24 states, , meaning that public schools are at liberty to manipulate and omit any information they deem necessary. Nineteen states and STIs rather than birth control and contraceptives, a harmful practice that leaves young people unprepared and uneducated about their own body and sexuality. Abstinence-only education efforts " and the fundamental public health principle of accurate, balanced sex education. Abstinence-only programs are geared to prevent teens – and sometimes all unmarried people – from engaging in any sexual activity." Only 18 with information about contraceptives, a key component to preventing pregnancies and STI transmission.

Sex Education: Abstinence-Only or ComprehensiveWhat is sex education? Everyone may have a different concept of what sex education means to them. To me, sex education is informing people about sexual intercourse, abstinence, pregnancies, contraception, and sexual transmitted diseases. This topic is generally discussed once puberty has taken place. Sex education is one of the most heated and controversial subject and has been for many years. The issue is not about sex educations being taught in

Abstinence-only education has been proven scientifically ineffective at reducing both pregnancy rates and the ..

Advocates of comprehensive sex education say the abstinence-only message ignores information critical for teens to protect their health. But they are not against the abstinence message itself.

"Sexual Addiction" Is NOT A Useful Diagnosis-And Why …

Impurity is an issue of importance to me. I have been raised to respect myself and save myself for the man I am going to marry. This generation is the example for the next generation. What kind of an example are they setting for younger kids? We are saying that it is okay to be impure, which it is not. It leads to self-destruction. Teenagers these days just do not care. They are destroying themselves emotionally and sometimes even physically. It is a very important issue that older people just don’t seem to care to confront young adults about. It seems as though “protection” is what everyone is turning to, even though people should be practicing abstinence. Teens are becoming parents before they are ready because they are not making the best decisions. Even doing things that provoke you to do more is impure. My boyfriend and I have both grown up making sure we stay pure. Even kissing can provoke you to want to do more. That’s why we have decided as a couple not to do that. I really wish that teenagers would get their minds straight and start to do what is right and not do what feels good. Another type of purity that we need to worry about is emotional purity. It is really not healthy to get ahead of our minds emotionally. I have seen way too many teenagers get engaged in high school because they let their emotions control their brain. Their heart is going faster than their heads are and it causes them to overthink things and plan things way too soon. High school engagements more than likely do not work out and that is why you need to make sure you are staying emotionally pure. Both emotional and physical purity are important.

Abstinence Abstinence is the only form of birth control ..

...When someone first enters my care for treatment of habits that should be stopped altogether, one of the first questions I ask is, "Do you want to stop your habit entirely, or would you rather practice moderation?" With rare exception, I hear an immediate, "I sure would like to be able to smoke or drink occasionally, like other people." or "I wish I could learn to gamble/exercise/eat/shop moderately and less often, like normal people do." Others say, "My problem is with street drugs, not booze, so why does everyone tell me that I have to stop drinking? It's natural to want to strive for the moderation of our habits rather than total abstinence. I can't imagine anyone indulging in their unhealthy habit of choice and not deriving some compelling benefits. But the fact is, abstinence is substantially easier to achieve. If you doubt that, just think about all the times you were able to go on a very strict and rigid diet, or stop smoking, or abstain from alcohol, gambling or drugs -- only to find that once you started drinking occasionally, or cheating on your diet, or borrowing cigarettes, you soon ended up right back where you started. It has become a clich?, but it's still more than a good joke: "I can quit any time I want. I've done it thousands of times!" Of course, the issue of moderation is not subject to discussion when your habits involve eating, spending, or relationships. With activities like these, moderation is the only option. What kind of...

"Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot?" That is 1 Corinthians 5:15, and to me it is one of the most important scriptures in the Bible. When I heard about this essay, the first thing that came to my mind was this awesome verse. It to me is the biggest reason why I support abstinence. Not only do I abstain because of my faith in Christ, I abstain because I know I have a bright future, and I do not want to tamper with it by creating a bank full of unforgiving emotions and regrets that I will have forever.

14.10.2011 · Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S. Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall ,

Abstinence Essays - StudentShare

The federal funding for abstinence-only education expired on June 30, 2009, and no funds were allocated for the FY 2010 budget. Instead, a “Labor-Health and Human Services, Education and Other Agencies” appropriations bill including a total of $114 million for a new evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative for FY 2010 was signed into law in December 2009. This constitutes the first large-scale federal investment dedicated to preventing teen pregnancy through research- and evidence-based efforts. However, despite accumulating evidence that abstinence-only programs are ineffective , , abstinence-only funding (including Title V funding) was restored on September 29, 2009 for 2010 and beyond by including $250 million of mandatory abstinence-only funding over 5 years as part of an amendment to the Senate Finance Committee's health-reform legislation (HR 3590, Amendment #2786, section 2954). This was authorized by the legislature on March 23, 2010 .

Why comprehensive sex education? Essay. believe that an abstinence only education is effective. Abstinence only programs do not prevent teenagers from having sex.

The appropriate type of sex education that should be taught in U.S. public schools continues to be a major topic of debate, which is motivated by the high teen pregnancy and birth rates in the U.S., compared to other developed countries – (). Much of this debate has centered on whether abstinence-only versus comprehensive sex education should be taught in public schools. Some argue that sex education that covers safe sexual practices, such as condom use, sends a mixed message to students and promotes sexual activity. This view has been supported by the US government, which promotes abstinence-only initiatives through the Adolescent Family Life Act (AFLA), Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) and Title V, Section 510 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (welfare reform), among others . Funding for abstinence-only programs in 2006 and 2007 was $176 million annually (before matching state funds) , . The central message of these programs is to delay sexual activity until marriage, and under the federal funding regulations most of these programs cannot include information about contraception or safer-sex practices , .